The stats of Valentine’s Day

Yes folks, a new year, a new set of blogs….  And since it’s approaching that time of year (Valentine’s Day), I thought I’d write about that 🙂

The typical feelings about Valentine’s Day varies depending on whether you are male or female, single or in a relationship, and for obvious reasons.  The stereotypes are that women expect to be pampered, men are expected to go all out doing the pampering and those not in a relationship spend the day either moping around or proudly proclaiming their independence.  As a girl myself, I would expect my fella to make some kind of effort!  But I’m also ashamed to admit that until now I haven’t given much thought as to how much pressure this puts on the guys…. is there actual evidence that on one specific day, men can feel more pressure than women?  If there *is* this pressure, do men tend to dread Valentine’s Day?  This also got me wondering what reasons people have to give presents; if they feel so stressed, why would they want to give presents at all?  So this is what I’ll be looking at 🙂

Otnes, Ruth and Milbourne (1994) did a qualitative study which focused solely on the male perspective of Valentine’s Day, as previous studies had focused on womens’.  They found that men do feel as if there is a negative pressure to participate in Valentine’s Day, but also that they enjoy giving gifts to their significant others despite this.  This to me is cute; blokes putting in the effort despite feeling the pressure to!  It’s also reassuring that they appear to enjoy spoiling us ladies.
However, a pilot study by Goodwin, Smith and Spiggle (1990) made me a tad concerned….  They found that ‘consumers tend to define gift giving as obligatory or voluntary, and [also] that this distinction affects their gift selection process and post-purchase behaviors.’  Basically, depending on whether people want to give gifts just because, or whether they feel that they have to – for a certain holiday for example – the gift that they would give differs, as does their behaviour.  Does this mean that presents given to us girls on Valentine’s Day (obligatory gift-giving) would be worse than the gifts our blokes would give us on any random day simply because they felt like it (voluntary gift-giving)?  Does it also mean that they would feel and act differently after the giving?  Are they giving us presents because they mean it, or just because they feel that they have to….?

Many men feel that it is all down to them on Valentine’s Day, for them to make the effort.  Rugimbana et al. (2003) support this by claiming that there is a social power relationship between the genders on Valentine’s Day.  These findings also back up what I mentioned earlier; that it is stereotyped that men are the ones who are supposed to do the pampering and women are the ones who are to be pampered.  These stereotypes may have occured due to the proposed social power relationship.

Whether it’s due to social pressures, simply what is expected or because they enjoy spoiling us, overall it looks as though it’s up to the fellas to do the work on the 14th February.  There is research into the topic, but personally I prefer the idea that men want to treat us well, and are being chivalrous.  Deluded, you might say, but it may be the case!  In about a week and half, regardless of your gender or relationship status, I hope you all have a happy Valentine’s Day.

 

 

References:

9 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Hannah
    Feb 06, 2012 @ 19:03:46

    I enjoyed reading your blog; it made stats not so painful, using it in a nice topic/theme, which made a nice change from the usual dampened mood stats usually brings with it.
    It was good that you had studies to back up your points; it shows that you researched your ideas. I thought the study about obligatory gift giving and voluntary gift giving very interesting.
    I like the way that you included many different parts of psychology and not just stats, such as social pressures and good old stereotyping.

    Reply

  2. Trackback: Homework for my TA WEEK 3 « hls92
  3. psud0b
    Feb 07, 2012 @ 20:20:27

    Nice touch making stats not so statsy, ashamed as I am to say it, I really enjoyed reading this! Its interesting how many wildly different things psychology can be involved in. Take altruism (mentioned in the Goodwin, Smith and Spiggle study) – researched in terms of trivial and arguably unimportant things like valentine’s day, but also in terms of giving to charity (http://papers.ssrn.com/soL3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1883604). Its good to know there’s more to psychology research than Milgram!

    Reply

  4. psud46
    Feb 08, 2012 @ 12:56:59

    This blog post interestingly raises psychological issues about Valentines Day I hadn’t previously considered! It made me begin to think about the broader psychological aspect of gift giving. Scheiffelin (1980) conducted a study into reciprocity and concluded that it is deeply rooted in underlying patterns of cultural thought. I suppose this opinion would disregard romance associated with gift giving on Valentines Day and support a more obligatory model

    Reply

  5. Sinae
    Feb 08, 2012 @ 17:09:46

    How cute are you? Haha! And this is right up my street with consumer psychology 😀

    Further studies also suggest that gift-giving is often seemed as mandatory and people (unfortunately) do feel obliged to give gifts. Marcel Mauss (1954) examined the process of gift-giving amongst various societies. From his examinations he concluded that there are three types of obligations related to the gift-giving process. These are:
    1. The obligation to give.
    2. The obligation to receive.
    3. The obligation to repay.
    So, at first we feel obliged to give someone a gift for a special occasion (possibly valentine’s day) and Mauss belives that after giving the gift we expect to receive something back (lol!) and from that… we then feel obliged to give them something back IN RETURN! So it’s just one huge cycle of obligated present swapping haha.

    However, you will be pleased to know that other psychologists believe that we don’t just buy someone a gift because we feel it’s rude not to (but still, gift-giving may not be entirely selfless….). Sherry (1983) describes gift giver motivations as altruistic and agonistic!  Altruistic intentions is when the giver focuses on the happiness of the person who receives the gift. Agonisitc intentions include the enhancement of the giver, so we ultimately get “gift-giver satisafaction” as we have made someone we love feel all happy. Mick and DeMoss (1990) support Sherry’s idea that gift-giving is not completely selfless as they describe gift-giving as a generally positive experience for the giver and is an experience that increases the giver’s self-concept as by giving the gift the giver feels generous.

    Sorry about the essay lol!
    😀

    Mick, D.G., & DeMoss, M. (1992). Further findings on self-gifts: products, qualities, andsocioeconomic correlates. Advances in Consumer Research 19 (1), 140–146.

    Sherry, J.F. (1983). Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective. Journal of Consumer
    Research 10, 157–168.

    Reply

  6. Trackback: Blog comments for 8th Feb « psud0b
  7. Trackback: Comments for Wendy « sinaealice
  8. francesdevine
    Mar 13, 2012 @ 21:18:23

    I actually found this topic really interesting and it got me thinking; on valentines day (or holidays in particular) since being in a relationship I now feel obligated in a way to buy my boyfriend a gift. Last year I bought him a card and felt really good about it, until I found out he bought me a bigger card, presents and a balloon. Like Sinae mentioned, I felt obligated this year to buy a better card and a present for him. Whilst I know he would be fine if he didn’t receive anything I’d feel enormous guilt over the idea.

    James Andreoni* has suggested an idea of ‘impure’ altruism. If you are altruistic in your giving you are supposed to get a ‘warm feeling’ from giving but not receiving. In my case I give a present back, half out of obligation but also because I like to show off that I have done something considered as ‘nice’, whereas I think he is truly altruistic and does it purely to make me happy.

    * http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1833247?uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4&sid=47698754254707

    Reply

  9. Trackback: Comments for TA (due 14.03.12) « francesdevine

Leave a comment

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 19 other subscribers